Category Archives: Lucy’s Blog

Any posts written by EMERGE’s CEO, Lucy Danger.

Lucy’s Blog

I was interested to read this week that now the majority of households in the UK operate on a fortnightly “black bag” bin collection service. This has been done citywide across Manchester since this July 2011.

If you haven't got a green bin, click on the pic to find out how to order one.

A fortnightly collection is easily do-able if you use all 4 bins effectively. Making sure that all food waste goes into the green bin really cuts down on residual waste that goes in the black bin. Whilst there have been criticisms of removing weekly collections it shouldn’t be a problem for most, as more than half of average household rubbish can be recycled according to MCC.

Bravo the courage and vision of those councils who see that encouraging homes to reduce, reuse, recycle (the real ‘3Rs’) their waste will inevitably lead to a reduced need for weekly general waste collections – or at least it should!

Through the practical “incentive” of reduced general waste services, householders will begin to see the benefit of separating resources properly for recycling and who knows – they might even start to think about all the different things they buy and whether they really need all that packaging and the other stuff that only ends up in the bin…

Lucy

Useful Links
Manchester City Council Press Release
Q&A on fortnightly collections from Manchester City Council

Food Glorious Food… What Next?

Greetings,

A massive thank you to everyone who got involved in our Question Time event on Food & Sustainability at Manchester University last night – great team work by staff and volunteers, fantastic Chair and panel, passionate audience co-mingled with the flowing of delicious wine… It was great to have some of the leading minds from the food sector thrashing out some of really complex issues surrounding food and sustainability and though we didn’t change the world (yet) it has hopefully kicked off a wider discussion with a slightly broader audience.

The Panel was headed by Mark Shayler ex-Asda Environmental Manager now runs consultancy firm Eco 3 with Pat Foreman, CEO of Foods NW, Chris Shearlock from the Co-operative, Julie Bagnoli proprietor of Isinglass Restaurant and a proponent of the Slow Food Movement; Debbie Ellen an independent researcher and advocate of relocalising food production, Stefan Stainsby of WRAP’s Love Food Hate Waste campaign. All the panellists and Chair made excellent contributions to the discussions, which didn’t really focus on waste so much as the wider ‘sustainability’ agenda, around the central issue of ‘how to make the UK/NW/Manchester more sustainable in relation to food?’ Having said that, figures from FareShare national were quoted by their spokesman, David Mellor, who claims an incredible 2.6 million tonnes of food are wasted in the supply chain annually (WRAP data) and hence FareShare’s focus now on working increasingly with the manufacturing sector – bring it on! Stefan Stainsby from the panel, WRAP’s Love Food Hate Waste (LFHW) representative, also reminded us that we consumers are the worst culprits in that we throw away nearly a third of what we purchase and hence the LFHW campaign’s focus on encouraging householders to only cook what they need, use leftovers and don’t buy too much in the first place!

Having listened carefully to the debate it seems self-evident that the more we can do to become self sufficient – learn how to grow, prepare and eat our own veg, rely less on oil-based and chemical products including meat and adapt our eating habits to seasonal, indigenous produce, the more ‘sustainable’ we can be in the purest sense. How achievable this is for everyone, requires further analysis, planning and training. Chris Shearlock challenged the idea that local, organic veg is less carbon-intensive than veg brought in from other countries, (though I suspect it’s a very technical argument requiring assessing each product on it on own impacts). Part of the debate focused around the connected issues of consumer demand (“producers respond to the wants of consumers”) versus the power/monopoly/brand values of producers, not least supermarkets (Why are producers constantly price-squeezed and not paid a fair price for produce? How much choice does the public really need? Why can’t refills be more commonly sold? And so on). Interestingly, Chris also maintained that transport and packaging impacts are a smaller proportion of the overall impact than is commonly thought – oil-based argicultural products and and water required in the growing process increasingly cost more…

This all led me to thinking: how would we go on if oil dried up and supermarkets were no more? Is it realistic and feasible for the population of Greater Manchester to feed itself? “A vegan diet can meet calorie and protein needs from just 300 square metres using mainly potatoes. A more varied diet with plenty of fruit and vegetables, grains and legumes would take about 700 square metres” (Wiki.answers.com). Greater Manchester spans around 493 square miles or 1,276 km2 and has an estimated population of 2,562,200 in 2008 (Wikipedia). So, even if everyone became vegan overnight, we would require 768,660,000 square metres of land to produce enough food to live on – i.e. 769 square km – 60% of our land would need to be growing food! This doesn’t take into account how much land is actually developed/available right now for growing anything on, window boxes, roof tops etc… Wow! It really would be a revolution… Not to mention bloody hard work!

Dunno about any of you, but I reckon: count your blessings, tighten your belt, sign up to ‘Meat Free Mondays’ (at very least, if not dairy free – go on see if you can do it!) – resolve yourself to enjoying to learn to cook lovely meals from scratch – get food aware and encourage others to do the same. After all, if we can all learn to live a little more lightly on our wonderful planet there’ll be a little bit more of it for our grandkids to enjoy! Sermon over (it is Sunday as I write!)

And if anyone fancies working with EMERGE to help us to deliver more food awareness work, please contact me in the first instance: 0161 223 8200 or lucy@emergemanchester.co.uk also check out the following links – recommended by Debbie Ellen:

Food For Life Partnership and Food and Climate Research Network Nb. ‘The world on a plate: reducing the food chain’s role in greenhouse gas emissions’ – a report to start you off.

Huge thanks to Mareen Winter who was a stunning organiser throughout and pulled off this event almost singlehandedly. Also to Mcr Uni for the venue and our friends at Taurus Bar (Canal Street) for lending us the glasses! I hope that everyone enjoyed the event as much as I did and left with a sense of hope that the food industry is committed to making changes and thinking more about the sustainability agenda and what they can be doing to make a difference.

Onwards & upwards!

Lucy.

EMERGE 3Rs

Summer Soup Surplus

Greetings,

This summer has seen a surplus of soup in Manchester – mountains of minestrone, cream of tomato, chicken and even green Thai soups.

According to FareShare, the food distribution charity based at New Smithfield Market, they have never had so much soup in stock, both tinned and fresh.

But they are having no problem in finding suitable kitchens to cook them, with over 40 community group members – feeding hundreds of homeless and low-income people – all benefitting in recent weeks.

This summer soup glut is a mystery and is just one of the issues likely to be aired on June 10th from 6-8pm at an awareness-raising event, hosted by EMERGE, the Manchester based social enterprise charity.

Entitled ‘Question Time on Food and Sustainability Issues’ the event will be run akin to the BBC’s Question Time format at University Place, Oxford Road, the University of Manchester.

The panel will be made up of a range of food “experts” headed by Mark Shayler, a former environment manager for Asda, who now runs consultancy Eco3, who will act as David Dimbleby in the role of chair. Pat Foreman, CEO of Food Northwest will be on the panel and Julie Bagnoli, a Business Link NW food sector advisor and proprietor of Isinglass restaurant.

Chris Shearlock, Environmental Manager at the Co-operative, Stefan Stainsby from WRAP’s Love Food Hate Waste campaign and Debbie Ellen, a Manchester based food researcher and grower, are also on the panel.

Tickets can be ordered online or bought on the evening of the event at the University Place though reservations in advance are preferred to avoid disappointment. Before the Question Time session, which starts at 6.00pm, there will be a drinks reception from 4.30pm to which all participants and Press are invited.

The event aims to raise awareness about the complexity of sustainable food supply chains & it promises to be a fascinating evening. We’re hoping for a real debate involving diverse and knowledgeable interventions from both the panel and the audience. People from different industries and backgrounds tend to have different views on, for instance, sourcing food locally or reducing packaging waste. This makes finding a solution for the issue much more challenging.

Please come and engage in what promises to be a thought provoking debate!

Lucy.

EMERGE 3Rs

Green Voters, What To Do?

Greetings,

For those still puzzling over who to vote for today, there was a really interesting article in yesterday’s Guardian outlining what Green Voters should consider when deciding who to vote for: Click Here.

I’m very interested to hear what other voters are thinking about doing in today’s election, feel free to comment below.

Onwards & upwards!

Lucy.

EMERGE 3Rs

Environmental Advocates For Election

Greetings,

A quick follow up on my previous post about a local waste boss in Manchester making a stand against spurious landfill claims.

For those who are interested in making a balanced decision taking into account the environment as well as economic and social agendas when it comes to election day, check out today’s article on the letsrecycle.com website which begins to outline who is standing where and what their stance is on the environment and green issues. More digging will be required no doubt to work out what your local candidates are saying…

Don’t be afraid to ask those difficult questions when deciding which box to tick, part of the job is being publicly accountable after all. And if we don’t engage and vote at all, how can we demand more from those who will ultimately gain the power?

Onwards & upwards!

Lucy.

EMERGE 3Rs

Only in Japan!

Greetings,

This is probably old news to some of you, but I was very impressed at the logic and effiecient thinking behind this rather fun Japanese innovation (only to be eaten on very special occasions due to the prohibitive price as you might expect): The Square Melon!

This really appeals to me for several reasons; firstly the fruit is not genetically modified or changed in any way, secondly because the fruit can now be packed more efficiently you can transport more of them on fewer lorrys, hence they can have a significant impact on the carbon footprint of your fruit salad!

I think this kind of innovation is not only a bit of fun but could genuinely make a big difference if all melons were grown in this way (or in smaller boxes to bring the price down perhaps).

Whatever next? Straight Bananas?

Onwards & upwards!

Lucy.

EMERGE 3Rs

Climate vs. Weather

Greetings,

It has always been something of a bugbear of mine that whenever I talk about climate change there is always one sceptic who will say something along the lines of “Climate change, that’s a load of rubbish, look at all this snow/sun/etc” completely missing the point that there is in fact a difference between Climate and Weather!

I very much enjoyed reading this article on the times website which nicely surmises the difference between the two. It also explains why it is paramount that we heed the advice of climate change scientists and disregard the opinions of journalists and the media who have neglected to commit the time to even understand the difference between the two, or the scale of the challenge we are currently facing.

Onwards & upwards!

Lucy.

EMERGE 3Rs

MRF Strikes Again

Greetings,

I was disappointed to read yet another report of the shocking levels of wastage generate by Materials Reclamation Facilities (‘MRF’s). It seems that Merseyside Waste Disposal Authority have released figures showing that at one of their facilities up to one tonne in every seven sent for reprocessing is then sent onto landfill.

Just another example of the potential for enormous inefficiencies in these facilities, as I had outlined in my previous blog post: MRF – Mechanical Recovery Fallacy.. Meanwhile, despite their set up and running costs, MRFs and their associated technologies continue to be cited as a marvellous invention in doing the work of separating our wasted resources…

At risk of sounding like a Luddite, how many people are currently out of work? And what about the lost opportunities to reiterate the resource efficiency message with the people who take the time to segregate materials for reprocessing?

Onwards & upwards!

Lucy

EMERGE Recycling

Climate Change: Don’t Believe The Hype!

Greetings,

I came across an article on the Independent’s website the other day which nicely surmises what I’ve been feeling recently about the ‘climate change’ debate. A lot of sceptics felt vindicated by the climategate scandal and there were implications that in some way the incident disproves all of the science which points towards anthropogenic global warming.

Whilst I agree with the sceptics that the alleged misconduct of the minority of climate scientists involved does damage the credibility of the science, I don’t believe that it gives anyone carte blanche to completely ignore the evidence their studies have produced.

As the world’s leading scientists work on the 5th assessment report for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change I think we have to listen very carefully to their findings. Hopefully when the government’s independent inquiry reveals their findings in March, we can put this controversy to bed and focus once more on the science of climate change and the actions we need to take to reduce it and mitigate against its impacts.

Onwards & upwards!

Lucy.

EMERGE 3Rs

MRF = Mechanical Recovery Fallacy?

Greetings,

Following on from my previous post about a local manchester waste boss making a stand against deceptive waste management companies, I thought I should probably do something to explain what the real issue is and why we are so incensed about it.

There is quite a comprehensive article on Wikipedia which explains in detail what an MRF is and how it operates. In effective it is a facility which uses mechanical procedures to sort co-mingled recyclates into single waste streams, which in principal is a good thing as it allows for co-mingled (i.e. unsorted) waste to be collected which simplifies waste collection for the waste producer. However the problem is that it is an inherently inefficient system, as not all of the material collected can be sorted by the MRF correctly and there is still a considerable amount of material which has to be sent to landfill due to issues like cross-contamination (to produce high quality secondary materials the recyclate needs to be as clean as possible).

It is due to these operational inefficiencies that WRAP published a report in July last year advocating segregated kerbside collections as the most efficient method of domestic recyclate collection.

The main issue with using a MRF for recycling business waste is that you have no guarantee that the waste you send to be recycled actually will be. As far as I am concerned, if you don’t know for definite that your company’s waste is being recycled, you may as well be sending it directly to landfill! The very valid concern raised in my previous post is that whilst MRF-end recycling services provide an ‘easier ‘ experience for waste producing businesses and their employees, the reality is that from a responsible, environmental and duty of care perspective you have no idea what is actually going to happen to your waste.

If we can all get used to recognising the value (and in some cases, toxicity) in everyday resources by establishing simple segregation systems in our home and work places and then using them consistently, not only will we be behaving more responsibly, but we can show the way, encouraging others to do the same and contributing to a ‘virtuous circle’ in turn helping our economy and the environment. Winner!

Onwards & upwards!

Lucy.

EMERGE 3Rs